The Chameleonic Nature of Hamas

 

Israel's military operations act as a double-edged sword against Hamas, simultaneously weakening its military strength while potentially igniting a fire of support. Against this backdrop, Hamas, like a chameleon on a shifting kaleidoscope, continuously adapts its strategies and colors to the ever-changing political and social landscape.

On October 7th, Hamas, a group recognized as a terrorist organization by many, launched a significant offensive across the Gaza border. This aggressive action led to the deaths of approximately 1,200 Israelis and the abduction of about 250 others, catapulting Hamas into the global spotlight. This incident rekindled the discussion on Palestinian statehood, a topic that had receded into the background as several Arab nations formed diplomatic ties with Israel under the Abraham Accords. However, Hamas appeared to have underestimated Israel's military reaction and seemingly had no extensive strategy beyond exchanging hostages for Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails. Now, two months into the conflict initiated by Hamas, the question arises: what is their plan moving forward?

One thing is clear: Hamas, a terrorist organization recognized by various countries and international bodies, showcases a complex and multifaceted character akin to a chameleon in its ability to adapt and transform. Founded in 1987 as an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas began by combining charitable work with militant activities. This duality has been a hallmark of the organization, enabling it to gain support through social services while pursuing its agenda through violence. The chameleon-like nature of Hamas is evident in its ability to present different faces to different audiences—a benevolent provider to its supporters and a ruthless adversary to its enemies. This multifaceted approach has allowed Hamas to establish a robust foothold in Palestinian society, where it is seen not just as a militant group but also as a provider of essential services.

Hamas's adaptability is further seen in its strategic responses to changing political landscapes. For instance, the organization's reaction to the Abraham Accords, which led to Arab countries normalizing relations with Israel, and its subsequent aggressive actions in Gaza highlight its ability to swiftly shift tactics. This fluidity in strategy, akin to a chameleon changing colors, underscores Hamas's focus on maintaining relevance and influence in the region, irrespective of the changing geopolitical dynamics.

Internally, Hamas is far from monolithic. The ongoing power struggles within the organization—between its radical wing in Gaza and more moderate elements in exile, as well as between those aligned with Iran and those seeking closer ties with Arab governments—reflect its chameleonic internal dynamics. These internal conflicts shape the organization's policies and actions, further complicating any straightforward understanding of its objectives and strategies. These struggles are not just about power but also about the future direction of Hamas, whether it leans more towards radical militancy or towards political pragmatism.

The financial aspect of Hamas is another area where its adaptability is evident. The organization's sprawling financial empire, estimated to bring in over $1 billion annually, demonstrates its ability to adapt and survive under various economic conditions. The support from Iran, both financial and in military expertise, further enhances its chameleonic capabilities, allowing it to maintain and upgrade its military arsenal despite facing numerous challenges, including international sanctions and blockades.

At its core, Hamas embodies a dichotomy: it operates as a social welfare movement on one hand and a terrorist group on the other. This duality has been a consistent feature since its inception and remains at the heart of its chameleonic nature too. The organization's ability to navigate between these two roles has been a key factor in its endurance and influence. This dichotomy is reflected in its actions and rhetoric, with Hamas often oscillating between calls for armed struggle and participation in political processes.

The Future of Hamas

The future trajectory of Hamas is shrouded in uncertainty, much like the unpredictable changes of a chameleon. This uncertainty stems from a myriad of factors, including internal power struggles within the organization, the impact of Israel's military operations, and the constantly evolving regional dynamics. These elements collectively play a significant role in shaping Hamas's path forward. The pivotal question that remains is whether Hamas will undergo a transformation into a purely political entity or continue its militant activities.

Like I noted above, Hamas faces significant challenges internally. Simply put, the organization is not a monolithic entity but rather a complex amalgam of various factions and ideologies. The power struggles between these factions – particularly between the more extremist elements in Gaza and the moderate factions in exile – are a critical factor in determining its future course. Not only that, the differing alignments within Hamas, such as those closely tied to Iran and its "axis of resistance" versus those advocating for closer ties with Arab governments, further complicate its internal dynamics. These internal battles are not just about power but also about the direction in which Hamas will head – will it lean towards a more militant stance or adopt a political approach?

The impact of Israel's current military operations on Hamas cannot be understated. These operations have the potential to significantly weaken Hamas's military capabilities and influence in the region. However, they also have the potential to galvanize support for Hamas, both within Palestinian territories and among the wider Arab population, depending on the perception of these operations. The way Hamas responds to these military pressures will be a key indicator of its future direction.

Moreover, the evolving regional dynamics, particularly the shifting alliances and the geopolitical landscape in the Middle East, will have a profound impact on Hamas. The organization's ability to adapt to these changes, maintain its financial resilience, and navigate the complex political terrain will be crucial in determining its future. Hence Hamas's future is as adaptable and multifaceted as a chameleon. Its ability to strategically shift, manage its internal complexities, and respond to external pressures will dictate whether it continues along a militant path or transforms into a more politically-oriented entity. As the political, social, and security landscape of the Middle East continues to evolve, so too will the nature of Hamas, reflecting the dynamic and often turbulent nature of the region.

 

 

 

Notes

Aboul-Enein, Y. H. (2003). Hamas, Understanding the Organization. Military review, 83(4), 65. Retrieved 12 15, 2023, from https://questia.com/library/journal/1g1-109268865/hamas-understanding-the-organization

Abu-Irshaid, O. (2013). The dialectic of religion and politics in Hamas' thought and practice. Retrieved 12 15, 2023, from https://repository.lboro.ac.uk/articles/the_dialectic_of_religion_and_politics_in_hamas_thought_and_practice/9466799

Bell, A., & Shefi, D. (2010). The Mythical Post-2005 Israeli Occupation of the Gaza Strip. Israel Affairs, 16(2), 268-296. Retrieved 12 16, 2023, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1577324

Belton, P. (2008). Palestine and Palestinians: The Politics of the Palestinian Authority: From Oslo to Al-Aqsa. Middle East Journal, 62(2), 349. Retrieved 12 15, 2023, from https://questia.com/library/journal/1p3-1473377351/palestine-and-palestinians-the-politics-of-the-palestinian

Buchan, R. (2012). II. The Palmer Report and the Legality of Israel's Naval Blockade of Gaza. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 61(01), 264-273. Retrieved 12 16, 2023, from https://cambridge.org/core/journals/international-and-comparative-law-quarterly/article/ii-the-palmer-report-and-the-legality-of-israels-naval-blockade-of-gaza/b02264db75ebef24b1c38547e5dbbe7c

Farahat, C. (2017). The Muslim Brotherhood, Fountain of Islamist Violence. Middle East Quarterly, 24(2). Retrieved 12 15, 2023, from https://meforum.org/6562/the-muslim-brotherhood-fountain-of-islamist

Gilligan, A. (n.d.). How the Muslim Brotherhood fits into a network of extremism. Retrieved 12 15, 2023, from https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/11398538/How-the-Muslim-Brotherhood-fits-into-a-network-of-extremism.html

Hamas 'in full control of Gaza'. (n.d.). Retrieved 12 16, 2023, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6755299.stm

Karsh, E. (2016). Why the Oslo Process Doomed Peace. Middle East Quarterly, 23(4), 1. Retrieved 12 15, 2023, from https://meforum.org/6264/why-the-oslo-process-doomed-peace

Pinfold, R. G., & Pinfold, R. G. (2019). Territorial withdrawal as multilateral bargaining: Revisiting Israel’s ‘unilateral’ withdrawals from Gaza and southern Lebanon. Journal of Strategic Studies, 1-32. Retrieved 12 16, 2023, from https://tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01402390.2019.1570146

Reuters. (2023, December 14). Poll Shows Palestinians Back Oct. 7 Attack on Israel, Support for Hamas Rises. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/poll-shows-palestinians-back-oct-7-attack-israel-support-hamas-rises-2023-12-14/#:~:text=Oct.%207%20was%20the%20deadliest,Gaza%2C%20according%20to%20Israeli%20tallies.

Spoerl, J. S. (2006). Hamas, Islam, and Israel. The Journal of Conflict Studies, 26(1). Retrieved 12 15, 2023, from https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/jcs/article/view/2166/2560

Tabraz, S. S. (2005). After Arafat: The Palestinian Question. Economic and Political Weekly. Retrieved 12 15, 2023, from http://epw.in/system/files/pdf/2005_40/05/after_arafat_the_palestinian_question.pdf

The Economist. (2023, November 30). The War in Gaza: Does Hamas Want to Keep Fighting Israel or Start Talking Peace? Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-africa/2023/11/30/does-hamas-want-to-keep-fighting-israel-or-start-talking-peace

Zanotti, J. (2010). Hamas: Background and Issues for Congress. Retrieved 12 15, 2023, from https://fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/r41514.pdf