Thursday, May 25, 2023

The Nigerian Army: A Tale of Corruption and Incompetence

 




 

The Nigerian army's decline is like watching a superhero movie in reverse - they started strong, but now they can barely catch a petty thief, let alone fight off terrorists or local mafias. Anybody paying attention will immediately notice that the Nigerian army is in trouble, especially given that their attempts to combat terrorism resemble a game of hide-and-seek where the Nigerian Army are always the ones hiding and the terrorists are very, very good at seeking.

 

The Nigerian army has long been a point of pride for the country, with a rich history of bravery and courage in the face of adversity. For instance, the Nigerian army's role in the Economic Community of West African States Monitoring Group (ECOMOG) was akin to a beacon of hope for war-torn countries in the 1980s and 1990s. Through ECOMOG, the Nigerian army was able to bring a much-needed stability and peace to countries like Liberia, Sierra Leone, and other African nations. The army's efforts were like a soothing balm for these countries, providing them with the peace and stability they so desperately needed.

The Nigerian army's involvement in ECOMOG at the time was also a shining example of the country's commitment to peacekeeping and humanitarian efforts in the region. The army's efforts to restore peace in these countries were akin to a giant leap forward in the fight against conflict and violence in Africa. Their  actions when it comes to peace keeping in West Africa were a testament to Nigeria's willingness to go above and beyond in the pursuit of peace and stability, and their success in this endeavor was a source of great pride for the nation.

Unfortunately, in recent years, the army has become a mere shadow of its former self, largely due to rampant corruption, favoritism, and nepotism in recruitment. This has led to a severe decline in the competence and effectiveness of the army, to the point where it can no longer effectively combat the threat of Boko Haram and other terrorist groups. The incapacity of the Nigerian military to combat the threats posed by Boko Haram in northern Nigeria and the "unknown gunmen" thugs (who are notorious in Eastern Nigeria for kidnapping, murder, and extortion) is perplexing, like an unexpected twist in a fascinating story. Once seen as a strong force, their inability to dismantle these ragtag gangs has continued to astounds every Nigerian citizen. Boko Haram, like a cunning fox, has infiltrated Nigeria's military bases, carrying out successful attacks that rock the very foundations of Nigeria's  national security. The leaders tasked with protecting the country, such as Defense Minister Bashir Salihi Magashi and Army Chief of Defense Staff, General Lucky Irabor, should be blamed for the consequences of their incompetence. It is a distressing reality that the ministry they supervise is ill-equipped to defend itself, let alone protect Nigerian citizens' lives.

Moment of Truth: Somebody’s Gotta Say It

The current state of the Nigerian army is like a ship caught in a raging storm, unable to navigate the treacherous waters of insecurity and violence that have engulfed the country. The army's weakness has left it vulnerable to attack from all sides, with different regions of the country falling under the control of local mafias and terrorist groups. The situation is like a nightmare for the people of Nigeria, who are living in constant fear of being abducted, kidnapped, or killed.

It is as if there is a parallel government operating in Nigeria, one that is run by criminals and terrorists who are free to carry out their nefarious activities without fear of reprisal. This situation has left many feeling like they are living in a lawless society, with the Nigerian army powerless to restore order and protect the citizens. The army's failure to control the current insecurity in the country is like a gaping wound in the nation's fabric, a wound that threatens to tear the country apart if left unchecked.

In many ways, the Nigerian army is now akin to a wounded animal, struggling to survive against overwhelming odds. Corruption and nepotism have created a toxic environment within the army, with promotions and appointments often being based on factors other than merit and ability. This has led to a lack of morale and motivation among many soldiers, who feel that their hard work and dedication are being overlooked in favor of those with connections or who are willing to pay bribes.

As a result of this widespread corruption and favoritism, the Nigerian army has become a breeding ground for incompetence and inefficiency. Training standards have fallen dramatically, with many soldiers ill-prepared and ill-equipped to deal with the challenges of modern warfare. The army is plagued by a lack of discipline and accountability, with many soldiers engaging in misconduct and abuse of power with impunity.

Perhaps the most troubling aspect of this decline in the Nigerian army's effectiveness is its inability to effectively combat Boko Haram and other terrorist groups. Once feared throughout West Africa for its formidable fighting force, the army now struggles to even contain the threat of Boko Haram, let alone defeat it. This is due in large part to the lack of training and discipline among soldiers, as well as a lack of leadership and strategic planning at the higher levels.

Simply put, the Nigerian army is similar to a ship without a captain, drifting aimlessly in dangerous waters. The leadership of the army has been unable to effectively address the corruption and nepotism that plagues the institution, and has failed to implement meaningful reforms to improve the army's training and capabilities. This has left the army vulnerable to attack, both from within and without, and has undermined the country's ability to defend itself against its enemies.

Modus Operandi

It is clear that the Nigerian army is in dire need of reform if it is to once again become a force to be reckoned with. This will require a concerted effort to root out corruption and favoritism, and to promote a culture of meritocracy and accountability. It will also require significant investment in training and equipment, as well as a renewed focus on strategic planning and leadership development.

However, it is important to recognize that these reforms will not happen overnight. They will require a sustained and committed effort on the part of both the government, the defense minister Bashir Salihi Magashi, and the military leadership, as well as the support and participation of all members of the army. Only by working together can the Nigerian army overcome the challenges it faces, and once again become a source of pride and strength for the country.

The Bottom line is this:  the current state of the Nigerian army is a cause for great concern, and highlights the dangers of corruption, favoritism, and nepotism in recruitment. Unless urgent action is taken to address these issues, the army will continue to decline in effectiveness and competence, and will be unable to defend the country against its enemies. It is time for the Nigerian government and military leadership to recognize the severity of this issue, and to take bold and decisive action to reform the army and restore its former glory.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes

 

Campbell, J. (2018, November 27). Boko Haram Overruns Outgunned Nigerian Military Base. Retrieved from Council on Foreign Relations: https://www.cfr.org/blog/boko-haram-overruns-outgunned-nigerian-military-base#:~:text=On%20November%2018%2C%20an%20army,the%20aftermath%20of%20the%20attack.

Chukwuma C.C. Osakwe, C. C., & Audu , B. N. (2017). The Nigeria Led ECOMOG Military Intervention and Interest in the Sierra Leone Crisis: An Overview. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(4), 107-114.

Habib, G. (2023, May 24). Nigeria Spent $8bn to Restore Peace in Liberia, Says Irabor. Retrieved from Punch: https://punchng.com/nigeria-spent-8bn-to-restore-peace-in-liberia-says-irabor/#:~:text=Nigeria's%20government%20has%20spent%20%248,the%20United%20Nations%20peacekeeping%20operations.

International Crisis Group. (2016, June 6). Nigeria: The Challenge of Military Reform. Retrieved from https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/west-africa/nigeria/nigeria-challenge-military-reform

McGregor, A. (1999). Quagmire in West Africa: Nigerian Peacekeeping in Sierra Leone (1997-98). International Journal, 54(3), 482-501.

Premium Times. (2023, February 13). Nigeria Military is Overstretched – Defence Minister. Retrieved from https://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/top-news/581754-nigeria-military-is-overstretched-defence-minister.html

Sahara Reporters. (2023, January 6). EXCLUSIVE: Nigerian Army Moves To Stop Soldiers From Resigning Over Low Morale, Loss Of Interest, Other Reasons. Retrieved from https://saharareporters.com/2023/01/06/exclusive-nigerian-army-moves-stop-soldiers-resigning-over-low-morale-loss-interest

 

 

Thursday, May 18, 2023

Nigeria’s Presidential Election Drama Revisited: Chaos, Count, and Confusion

 

The recently concluded  presidential election in Nigeria was like a photo finish, with results appearing blurry and questionable. Tinubu's victory has left many Nigerian scratching their heads like perplexed kangaroos.

 

I had planned to write about the election in Nigeria that just ended. But every time I try to start the piece, I often lose interest because I am still upset about how that election turned out. It's like trying to write a love letter to your crush, only to find out that they're already taken. You just lose all drive and begin to consider drinking several shots  of Hennessy  to make yourself feel better. As I wallowed in my despondency, contemplating drowning my sorrows in a sea of Hennessy, a headline from Reuters, echoed by Yahoo News, hit me like a lightning bolt: "U.S. Casts Election-Related Visa Restrictions on Nigerians." It was a jolt of energy that snapped me out of my stupor, propelling me into a fervent writing frenzy about the Nigerian presidential election that was concluded three months ago. The headline prompted me to feel a feeling of urgency to investigate and report on the impact of the election by revealing its  potential repercussions on international relations. It also highlighted the relevance of the election in the global arena, which further highlighted its significance.

Nigeria's current ruling party's candidate, Bola Tinubu, was named the winner of the closest presidential election in decades after a chaotic vote and a messy count. The Nigeria's  electoral board said on March 1 that Mr. Tinubu, a 70-year-old former governor of Lagos and kingmaker in Nigerian politics for many years, got 37% of the vote. This put him ahead of Atiku Abubakar (29%), a businessman running for the main opposition party, the People's Democratic Party (PDP), and Peter Obi (25%), a third-party candidate running as a wild card for the Labor Party (LP).

The majority of pollsters and Nigerians  were surprised by Mr. Tinubu's victory, as they had placed Mr. Obi in a commanding lead in the competition to govern Africa's nation with the largest economy and the most populated population. (However, there were some analysts who expressed skepticism on the accuracy of the results of various surveys on account of the significant number of respondents who stated that they would not disclose their voting preference.) In addition to this, Mr. Tinubu's so called victory ensures that the All Progressives Congress (APC) party, which has led the government since 2015, would continue to hold power. During this time period, the average standard of living of Nigerians has decreased, while the country's levels of violence, separatism, and insecurity have increased. Concerns that the opposition parties' allegations of vote-rigging could lead to unrest shook the financial markets, resulting in a decline for Nigeria's international bonds.

As a result of the utilization of modern technology by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), this election was anticipated to be the cleanest and most transparent election that has ever taken place in Nigeria. Its methods were designed to unequivocally identify voters and send photographs of the results straight from each of the 176,846 polling places to a centralized collection point, where the general public would be able to view and validate them.

Increasing confidence in the democratic process was the goal of this plan. Many people in Nigeria have clear recollections of the presidential election that took place in 2011, when over 800 people were killed in clashes as a result of the losing party's allegations of electoral fraud. In spite of this, the Nigeria's Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has committed a number of errors, which has once again given rise to claims of vote manipulation,  rigging and improper conduct. Opposition parties have demanded that the election be held again. Concerns have been raised that the situation could escalate into violence, with the outcomes virtually probably being brought before the courts.

There were problems from the very beginning of the electoral process. There is documentary evidence that  one-third of polling locations were still not open an hour after voting had begun on February 25th - the election day in Nigeria.  Officials at some stations were working with insufficient materials. In battleground states like Lagos, Kano, and Rivers, armed men stormed and attacked some polling places while voters were casting their ballots. In addition to these accusations, there were also reports of voter intimidation, the buying and selling of votes, the theft of ballot boxes, and the burning of ballot papers. There is little doubt that all of this led to a lower turnout. With only 25% of eligible voters casting their votes, the turnout was significantly lower than the previous election in 2019, which saw 35% of registered voters cast their ballots.

 

A Comedy of Errors

 

The counting was likewise done in an arbitrary and haphazard  manner. The mechanism that was supposed to transmit the results electronically was plagued with several malfunctions. A sizeable portion of the election results  were never uploaded. The labels on several of them were both illegible and in the wrong order. Some of the returning officers made the mistake of sending in selfies rather than the tally sheets they were supposed to send in.

Voters who were dissatisfied with the results that were revealed at their polling stations flooded social media with images of the results in an effort to demonstrate discrepancies with the results that were reported at higher levels. In addition, party officials distributed images of handwritten forms that appeared to have been crossed out and replaced multiple times. At the Lagos collation center, an official with the Labor Party voiced her dissatisfaction with a colleague, claiming that the results were signed at gunpoint by the colleague. After receiving threats of physical harm, the electoral officer in Rivers state decided to suspend the vote count.

The parties that support Messrs. Abubakar and Obi have demanded a re-run of the election as well as the resignation of Mahmood Yakubu as head of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). According to Datti Baba-Ahmed, who is running for vice president on the LP ticket, the future government is likely to be constructed on blatant acts of criminality. The vice presidential candidate for the PDP, Ifeanyi Okowa, stated that Mr. Yakubu had a moral obligation to save Nigeria by halting the vote count. The procedure was described as free, fair, and credible by officials from INEC. According to Mr. Tinubu, the amount of alleged irregularities  was few in number, and they were inconsequential to the final outcome. In a preliminary report, international observers stated that the election fell well short of the legitimate and reasonable expectations of Nigerian citizens.

The opposition party is already seeking redress in the courts, which is something that frequently occurs after elections in Nigeria. It's possible that evidence gleaned from social media and other independent sources will prove to be essential to their case. There is a good chance that some tight results in areas where Mr. Tinubu just barely made it over the barrier of 25% that any candidate needs to clear in at least two-thirds of Nigeria's 36 states and the federal capital in order to avoid a run-off election will be subjected to a particularly close level of scrutiny. Mr. Tinubu, whom INEC claimed was successful in accomplishing this goal in 29 states (but not in the capital), received only 25.01% of the vote in Adamawa state and 25.8% in Bayelsa state.

These near misses are indicative of a close race as well as a country that was divided into three distinct camps during the election, with each of the three major contenders gaining the lead in a separate set of 12 states. It is possible that Mr. Tinubu's capacity to unite a country that is still fragmented by religion, language, and ethnicity would be hindered by such divisions, as well as by the issues that have been raised about the validity of his election.

The fact that Mr. Tinubu is known for being a kingmaker motivated solely by his personal self-interest is not beneficial to his cause. His campaign slogan, "Emi lo kan," in Yoruba language, means "It's my turn." After such a vicious battle, it appears that,  in fact, it is.

The bottom line is this: With a reputation as a self-interested kingmaker, Tinubu's ambitions face headwinds, as his campaign slogan echoes a sentiment of personal entitlement. In the aftermath of this fierce battle, the question remains whether it truly is his turn or a different destiny awaits.

The curtains have been drawn, and the stage is set for Mr. Tinubu's grand presidential inauguration on May 29. However, lurking beneath the surface lies a tumultuous reality. With a reputation as a self-interested puppet master, Tinubu's lofty aspirations find themselves caught in a whirlwind of resistance, as his campaign slogan reverberates with an air of entitlement. As the dust settles from this fierce battleground, where INEC declared his triumph, the burning question lingers: Will it be a glorious coronation or a divergent path that awaits the fate of Nigeria?

 

 

 

 

 

Notes

 

Oyero, K. (2023, February 28). At Joint Briefing, Okowa, Baba-Ahmed Ask INEC To Cancel Elections . Retrieved from Channels TV: https://www.channelstv.com/2023/02/28/at-joint-briefing-okowa-baba-ahmed-ask-inec-to-cancel-elections/

Reuters. (2023, May 15). U.S. Imposes Election-Related Visa Restrictions on Nigerians. Retrieved from Yahoo News: https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-imposes-election-related-visa-124055302.html

Sivabalan , S., & Goko, C. (2023, February 28). Nigerian Bonds Drop as Opposition Boycott May Delay Vote Outcome. Retrieved from Bloomberg: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-02-28/nigerian-bonds-halt-rally-as-investors-await-clearer-result#xj4y7vzkg

The Economist. (2023, March 1). A Change of the Old Guard: Bola Tinubu, Nigeria’s Political Kingmaker, Wins a Flawed Election. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-africa/2023/03/01/bola-tinubu-nigerias-political-kingmaker-wins-a-flawed-election

 

 

Saturday, May 13, 2023

A Costly Gamble: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of College Education

 


Governments have long touted college as a golden staircase to social mobility and economic growth, but with rising tuition fees and stagnant graduate earnings, the disillusionment with higher education is growing like a dark cloud on the horizon.

 

It is graduation season again, but is college still a boon for social mobility and economic growth? At one time, the answer to that question appeared to be obvious. Over the past several decades, increasing numbers of young adults in both developed and less developed countries have been enrolling in higher education programs. College has been lauded by governments as a means of improving both social mobility and economic prosperity. Recently, disillusionment is growing as a result of rising tuition costs and graduates' incomes remaining flat or static. There is a significant body of scholarly material that points to a worsening confidence problem. For instance, a survey that was conducted and published by the Wall Street Journal, which is a newspaper that focuses on business news, found that 56% of people in the United States currently believe that earning a degree is no longer worth the effort and expense that it requires.

At least for a normal college freshman, this doesn't fit with the facts. In most places and for most students, getting a college degree still brings in a lot of financial benefits. Yet getting a degree has become riskier. The benefits for the best students are getting better, but a worryingly large number of students aren't getting anything financially good out of their studies.

New data sets, like tax records, are shedding more light on this than ever before. They can basically keep track of how much students who take certain classes or pursue certain degrees at specific colleges earn in the future. In the long run, this information will help students avoid the worst payoffs and grab the best ones. Choice of college degree and time of graduation are very important, but choice of college or university isn't as important. It could also help states who want to stop people from getting low-value degrees.

In the rich world, college graduates started making more money in the 1980s. The college-wage premium, which is what people call the difference in pay between people with at least a bachelor's degree and those without one, started to grow at that time. In the 1970s, an American with a college degree made 35% more than an American with a high school diploma. This edge had grown to 66% by 2021.

In many countries, the pay premium has either stopped going up or is starting to go down. Costs have also gone up in places where students have to pay for their degrees (see Table 1). In the late 1990s, there was no tuition in England. Now, it costs £9,250 ($11,000) a year, which is the most in the rich world. From about $2,300 a year in the 1970s to about $9,000 a year in real terms, the out-of-pocket costs of a bachelor's degree in the United States have gone up, according to the available published evidence. Most of the time, students at public universities pay a lot less than those at private non-profits.

Still, the average degree is still worth something. Studies have given a rough estimate of how much money an average American earns each year after getting a bachelor's degree. There is a lot of other published data that shows the average rate of return for a bachelor's degree in 2019 is around 14%. In the early 2000s, that was as high as 16%. But it's still a lot of money. And it's a lot more than the 8–9% that American graduates made in the 1970s, before pay for graduates and tuition fees started to go up. These figures take into account both fees and the amount of money a person could make if they worked full-time instead.

But the averages hides a wide range of results. Until recently, polls were the main way for economists to figure out who won and who lost when it comes to getting college degrees. Governments, like those of Britain and Norway, are now more likely to offer large, anonymous records that show the real earnings of millions of college students. This makes it much easier to compare people who has various degrees. The broken-down numbers show that a lot of students get degrees that aren't worth the money they cost.

The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), a research group, says that in England, 25% of male graduates and 15% of female graduates will make less money over the course of their jobs than their peers who do not get a degree. America has less complete data, but they have started putting out information about how many students  at thousands of colleges don't earn more than the average high school graduate early on. Researchers at Georgetown University in Washington, DC, have found that 27% of students who start at a normal four-year college do not finish it six years later. More than half of the people who enroll in the long tail, which is made up of the worst 30% of two- and four-year schools in the U.S., don't meet this standard.

 

Table 1: Estimated Average Cost of Bachelor’s Degree (Tuition Fees) by Country

 

Country

Tuition (International)

Living Expenses

Argentina

Free to $15,000

$2,800 - $5,000/year

Australia

$20,000 (public) - $45,000 (private)

$16,700/year

Canada

$20,000 - $45,000

$15,000 - $17,000/year

Brazil

Free to $15,000

$4,200 - $17,800/year

U.K. (England)

$17,000 - $43,000

$21,700

U.K. (Scotland)

$25,000

$20,000

Denmark

$8,000 - $21,000

$13,500/year

Germany

Free to $35,000

$14,400/year

Spain

$850 - $28,000

$12,000

China

$4,700 - $46,000

$14,600

France

$3,400

$12,200

Japan

$7,200 - $16,000

$10,500

India

$$350 - $5,500

$4,600

Russia

$1,300 - $6,000

$6,800

South Korea

$16,800

$9,500

Dubai

$7,800 - $32,000

$12,500 - $45,000/year

Italy

$1,200 - $7,500

$9,600

United States

$9,377 - $37,000

$16,300

 

Source: Culled from Education Data Initiative (Hanson, 2021; Hanson, 2023)

 

Dropping out without finishing is a clear way to lose a lot of money. Taking longer than normal to finish college also reduces value because it wastes years that could have been spent working full-time. Both of these things happen often. Less than 40% of people in the rich world who are working on their first degrees finish them in the time they are supposed to. Three years later, about a fifth of them still don't have any qualifications.

Choosing the right course or degree is very important if one want to make more money with their college education.  According to The Economist, a news magazine, Britons who study creative arts (less than 10% of men make a good return), social care, and agriculture are most likely to have negative returns. Engineering, computer science, and business degrees are by far the most valuable in the United States. Most likely to have bad results in terms of earning power are music and the visual arts. Trying to guess a person's total earnings by program based on the data we have about America is a stretch. But Preston Cooper, who works at a think tank called FREOPP, thinks that more than a quarter of bachelor's degree programs in the United States will not pay off for most of the students who graduated from college.

Most of the time, what you learn is more important than where you do it. That's true, but there are caveats. The worst colleges and universities don't offer much value to their students, no matter what they teach. But the best available data shows that people who go to public universities in the U.S. make more money over their lifetimes than those who go to the more prestigious private non-profit universities. One reason for this is that the non-profits have high tuition fees.

Earnings figures from Britain call into question the idea that smart college students  will always do better if they are forced to go to very selective schools. Some young people apply for the easiest subject, even if it doesn't normally bring in a lot of money, in order to get into the college or university  they want. Parents who want their kids to go to Oxford or Cambridge no matter what should pay attention to this problem of earning power after graduation. But there is also proof that taking a high-paying course just for the sake of it can backfire. Academic research shows that students who want to study arts but end up studying science make less money after ten years than they probably would have if they had studied what they really wanted to study.

Men have more reason than women to worry that the money they put into college won't pay off. This is because they are more likely to make a good living without a degree. If one didn't do well in school, going to college is a risk because they might end up making less money than people who got the same degree but were better prepared.

In Britain, the return on a degree is usually higher for South Asian students than for white students because they tend to study business. On the other hand, the return on a degree is usually lower for black students compared to what people of the same race earn if they don't go to college. Compared to white and black students, Asian students in America seem to have the least trouble paying off their student loans.

 

Changing Landscape

 

What do you think the takeaways are from all of this analysis? Already there are indications that the market for higher education is beginning to change. At varying points in their education, individuals are already initiating their own searches for lucrative investment opportunities. Between 2011 and 2021, there was a roughly one-third decrease in the number of degrees that were awarded annually in English and in history in the United States. During that time period, the number of people graduating with degrees in computer science more than doubled. Others are choosing not to attend college at all. Since 2011, the number of persons who signed up for college programs has decreased annually.

Additionally, institutions are undergoing change by eliminating humanities departments. Recent decisions by the board of Marymount University in Virginia have resulted in the elimination of degree programs in nine disciplines, including English, history, philosophy, and theology. There are several universities, like Calvin University in Michigan and Howard University in Washington, DC, that have stopped teaching their students the classics. Additionally, the future of archaeology at the University of Sheffield in Britain appears to be uncertain.

Employers are also adjusting their practices. Companies are showing a trend toward becoming less likely to insist that job applicants possess degrees as well. Tight labor markets and the demand for people with a wider range of experiences and perspectives both contribute to explain why. It is worth pointing out that just a few years ago approximately 80% of the jobs that the technology giant IBM advertised in the United States required a degree. At this point, it is close to 50%. As a result, having a degree is no longer the sole indication of the skills that a someone may possess.

Should governments put more emphasis on these tendencies? In Estonia, the percentage of students who complete their degrees within the allotted time is one of the several metrics that determine how much funding an educational institution receives. There are also systems like this in place in Sweden, Finland, Israel, and Lithuania. The Australian government is making an effort to encourage students to make decisions that are beneficial to society. The tuition for undergraduate students studying social sciences, political science, or communications was increased by a factor of two in 2021, while the tuition for nursing and teaching was decreased by a factor of two. Students do not appear to be particularly moved by the recent changes, which may be due to the lenient terms under which student loans are repaid in Australia. The government of Britain believes that it can change people's behaviors with respect to choosing the right college degrees by providing each resident of England with an online account that details the maximum amount of money they are permitted to borrow from the state for the purpose of furthering their education over the course of their lifetime. The goal is to instill thriftiness in those who have graduated from high school.

Others continue to overspend. The  President of the United States, Joe Biden, is optimistic that the Supreme Court would soon give its blessing to a proposal that was introduced  to forgive a sizeable portion of the student debt in the United States. He also wants a more forgiving payback method. Over the course of the next decade, the expenditures associated with this might add up to hundreds of billions of dollars. Additionally, Mr. Biden pledges to compile an official list of classes of "low-financial value." The argument for barring weak programs from receiving funding from the federal government for student loans is more compelling. However, if Congress does not take action, this will mostly impact for-profit colleges, which only enroll a small portion of the total number of students in the United States.

Many people find it offensive that more and more attention is being paid to the financial benefits of higher education. Graduates who go into public service will almost certainly make less money than those who work on Wall Street. There are many fields of study that are valuable in and of themselves. However, many students respond to surveys by stating that increasing their earning potential is one of their top priorities. For students who come from the most disadvantaged backgrounds and for whom the cost of higher education is the greatest, satisfactory returns are of the utmost importance. A startling number of people today have the so-called bad degrees It is possible for their prevalence to be reduced by the implementation of improved knowledge, market forces, and  smarter policies.

The bottom line is this: Valuable fields of study are like a good book – you can't judge their worth by the number of pages or the thickness of the cover. In the meantime, let's hope the prevalence of bad degrees decreases faster than the time it takes for a student to realize they accidentally enrolled in a medieval basket weaving course.

 

 

Notes

 

BBC News. (2021, May 21). University of Sheffield Archaeology Department Threat 'Blow to UK'. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-57199118

Belkin, D. (2023, March 31). Americans Are Losing Faith in College Education, WSJ-NORC Poll Finds. Retrieved from Wall Street Journal: https://www.wsj.com/articles/americans-are-losing-faith-in-college-education-wsj-norc-poll-finds-3a836ce1

Britton , J., Dearden, L., Waltmann , B., & van der Erve, L. (2020, February 29). The Impact of Undergraduate Degrees on Lifetime Earnings. Retrieved from The Institute for Fiscal Studies: https://ifs.org.uk/publications/impact-undergraduate-degrees-lifetime-earnings

Carnevale, A. P., Cheah, B., & Van Der Werf, M. (2020). ROI of Liberal Arts Colleges: Value Adds Up Over Time. Retrieved from Georgetown University's Center on Education and the Workforce: McCourt School of Public Policy: https://cew.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/Liberal-Arts-ROI.pdf

Cooper, P. (2022, March 31). How to Hold Colleges and Universities Accountable for Prices and Outcomes. Retrieved from FREOPP: https://freopp.org/improving-return-on-investment-in-higher-education-principles-for-reform-e6ed38c50ae5

Getahun , H., & Snodgrass , E. (2023, March 10). Catholic Liberal Arts College in Virginia Courts Backlash After Cutting Several Majors, Including Religious Studies, English, and Math. Retrieved from Insider: https://www.insider.com/marymount-university-to-cut-9-majors-including-english-math-2023-3#:~:text=Trustees%20at%20Marymount%20University%2C%20a,student%20concerns%20about%20the%20decision.

Hanson, M. (2023, April 3). Average Cost of College & Tuition. Retrieved from Education Data Initiative: https://educationdata.org/average-cost-of-college#:~:text=The%20average%20cost%20of%20attendance,or%20%24218%2C004%20over%204%20years.

Hanson, N. (2021, August 9). Average Cost of College By Country. Retrieved from Average Cost of College By Country: https://educationdata.org/average-cost-of-college-by-country

Hardy , A., & Tuttle, B. (2023, March 31). Most Americans Say College Is No Longer Worth the Cost. Retrieved from Money: https://money.com/college-costs-no-longer-worth-it-survey/

Horton, A. P. (2020, July 28). Why Australia is Doubling Fees for Arts Degrees. Retrieved from BBC Worklife: https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20200728-why-australia-is-charging-more-to-study-history

Inskeep, S. (2021, May 10). Howard University's Decision To Cut Classics Department Prompts An Outcry. Retrieved from NPR: https://www.npr.org/2021/05/10/995389117/howard-universitys-decision-to-cut-classics-department-prompts-an-outcry

National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). Fast Facts: Most popular majors. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=37

Nova, A. (2023, April 22). Supreme Court Will Rule Against Biden’s Student Loan Forgiveness Plan, Legal Experts Predict. Retrieved from CNBC: https://www.cnbc.com/2023/04/22/bidens-loan-forgiveness-to-be-blocked-supreme-court-experts-predict-.html

OECD. (2023). The Allocation of Public Funding to Higher Education Institutions. Retrieved from OECD Library: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/e1f2d1b5-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/e1f2d1b5-en

Pew Research Center. (2011, mAY 15). Is College Worth It? Retrieved from PRC Executive Summary: https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2011/05/15/is-college-worth-it/

Ruggeri, A. (2019, April 1). Why ‘Worthless’ Humanities Degrees May Set You Up for Life. Retrieved from BBC Worklife: https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20190401-why-worthless-humanities-degrees-may-set-you-up-for-life

The Economist . (2023, April 3). Useless Studies: Was Your Degree Really Worth It? Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/international/2023/04/03/was-your-degree-really-worth-it

Townsend , R. B. (2021, February 23). Has the Decline in History Majors Hit Bottom? Retrieved from American Historical Association: Perspectives on History: https://www.historians.org/research-and-publications/perspectives-on-history/march-2021/has-the-decline-in-history-majors-hit-bottom-data-from-2018%E2%80%9319-show-lowest-number-since-1980

 

 




Wednesday, May 3, 2023

Bakhmut's Defense: A Thorn in Russia's Parade

 


 The fall of Mariupol eluded Putin's grasp like a slippery eel, for one simple reason: his so-called “special military operation” was nothing but a Trojan horse, filled with false hopes and broken dreams.

Vladimir Putin's hopes of a victorious parade have been consistently deflated by Ukraine's stubborn resistance. I mean, it is obvious to anyone who is paying attention to the news: Vladimir Putin is a showman who likes parades. When he invaded Ukraine on February 24 of last year, he thought that his "special military operation" would bring victory within days. Some units were said to have dress uniforms already packed. Later, he hoped that the fall of Mariupol, a port city on the Azov Sea, would happen on May 9, the same day as his yearly Victory in Europe Day parade. But Ukraine held out for one more week, and the Moscow show was a bust. This year's parade looks like it could be dangerous because on May 3, Russia said it had shot down two Ukrainian drones that were headed for the Kremlin. Ukraine said it was not responsible for the attack.

The show probably wouldn't have had much to celebrate anyway. This year, Mr. Putin's goal is a lot smaller than Mariupol, and he hasn't reached it yet. Russia has been trying to take over Bakhmut, a town in the eastern Donbas area that had 70,000 people living there before the war. This has been going on for over ten months. Fighting is getting worse, which suggests that Russia's generals are doing everything they can to get it to the Kremlin by May 9—no matter what it costs. On May 1, the White House said that since December, over 20,000 Russians soldiers had been killed. A large number of them probably died in or near Bakhmut, making it the most expensive fight since Iran attacked Basra 36 years ago. Public evidence shows that outgunned Ukrainian troops are moving back 50–75 meters per day. They are now only in the western parts of the city.

When the textbooks about this war are written in the future, they will definitely talk about why the town was fought over in the first place. Bakhmut isn't that important when it comes to war strategy. The hills to the west of the town are a better natural defense. The city has been turned into a pile of burning ruins. According to papers that were recently leaked from the Pentagon, the U.S. has been privately telling Ukraine's leaders to retreat since January. But Bakhmut has gained political significance  that seems to be stronger than its military necessity. Since the fighting started last July, it has become a sign of defiance for the Ukrainians. Even though the town is small and in bad shape, the Russians are eager to take it. Since late summer, it has been the main place where they have been fighting. For Ukraine, it's important for pretty much the same reason: to keep Russia from getting a win that would boost its morale and to wear down the Russian forces - the enemy - in the process.

Russian forces have been slowly moving forward thanks to their superior artillery, waves of convicts who were put to work, and the use of special airborne assault units, which are now stationed on the sides of the city. On April 25, a top member of the Ukrainian military's intelligence service said that Ukraine only held 30% of the city. At that rate, Russia could take Bakhmut in a few weeks.

In private, Ukraine's generals say that the way the battle has gone has still shown that they were right to keep defending Bakhmut. Some Ukrainian leaders say that Russia has lost ten times as many soldiers around the town as it has won. Observers who aren't part of the group say this is way too high. The number of people who die in Bakhmut has changed over time, according to most recent data. But at a low point in January and February, when Russian forces threatened to encircle the Ukrainian deployment, the ratio probably hit parity. Now, it is almost one Ukrainian loss for every Russian loss, which is a worrying situation given that Russia has more soldiers.

Things got a little bit better in March, but only after Ukraine sent in special troops to protect the north and south. The last three weeks have been especially hard because Russian strength has been getting worse at the same time. Andrei, an artilleryman in the 93rd Brigade, one of the two responsible for defending Bakhmut, told the news magazine The Economist that Russian troops can now blow up the two remaining Ukrainian roads into the town, making it hard to re-supply.  He further explained that the way in from the north-west is now impassable. The one to the south is constantly shelled.

 

A Victory in Name Only

The battle has not been won yet. In Bakhmut, Ukraine has performed beyond anyone's wildest dreams, clinging to life for much longer than analysts from the American intelligence community anticipated it would. Yevgeny Prigozhin, the leader of the Wagner mercenary group, which has been responsible for supplying the vast majority of the Russian army's cannon fodder in Bakhmut, is publicly protesting that his forces do not have enough ammo. It's possible that the Russian commanders are limiting supply on purpose. It is not entirely obvious if they are acting in this manner in preparation for a counteroffensive on the part of the Ukrainian military or as a result of infighting between Mr. Prigozhin and the regular armed forces.

A spokesman for Ukraine's eastern command named Serhiy Cherevaty indicated that Wagner is still the only significant offensive force in Bakhmut. The vast bulk of the 30 to 40 waves of attacks that occur daily there are carried out by their forces from locations that are already established within the city. It is essential to take into account the fact that Russian commanders in that region have not been reluctant to send their soldiers into "meat-grinder attacks." They fire artillery practically at their own men each time Ukrainian soldiers attack their trenches, which indicates that Russia and Wagner truly don't care about their soldiers at all.

Even if Russia were to succeed in capturing Bakhmut, the victory would be nothing more than a hollow one. If Russia makes a big deal out of capturing a regional town of questionable strategic relevance, it may draw attention to how little progress the country has made after 10 months of combat. As a result of this process, it has wasted its offensive potential, making it more susceptible to being attacked by the Ukrainian Army. On May 9th, Mr. Putin will hold a spectacle in Red Square, and it will only serve to highlight how little he has to show for his invasion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes

Cordell, J. (2022, December 31). Putin Uses New Year Address for Wartime Rallying Cry to Russians. Retrieved from Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/putin-says-new-year-message-west-is-using-ukraine-destroy-russia-2022-12-31/

Osborn, A. (2023, April 6). Explainer: Bakhmut: Why Russia and Ukraine are Battling So Hard for One Small City. Retrieved from Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/bakhmut-why-russia-ukraine-are-battling-so-hard-one-small-city-2023-03-14/

Quinn, A. (2023, May 3). Kremlin Says Putin Survived Overnight Assassination Attempt. Retrieved from Yahoo News: https://www.yahoo.com/news/kremlin-says-putin-survived-overnight-114602738.html

Smith, A., Fobes, G., & De Luce, D. (2023, May 2). 20,000 Russians Killed in Ukraine Since December, U.S. Says. Retrieved from Yahoo Life: https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/20-000-russians-killed-ukraine-160816934.html

The Economist. (2023, May 3). No Victory Day: An Unhappy Anniversary for Vladimir Putin. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/europe/2023/05/03/an-unhappy-anniversary-for-vladimir-putin

 

 

 

 

 

 

China’s Fiscal Band-Aid Won’t Stop the Bleeding When Trump’s Tariff Sword Strikes

  China's cautious stimulus is nothing but a financial fig leaf, barely hiding the inevitable collision course it faces with Trump's...