The
best thing for Europe would be to welcome refugees and migrants, not only for
moral reasons but also for selfish ones too.
Just like the United States did with successive waves of refugees in the
20th century, a more open Europe with more flexible labor
markets could turn this refugee and migrant crisis into a rewarding
opportunity.
The fuse that led to the current
influx of refugees and migrants in Europe was lit in Syria in March 2011 when
an anti-regime uprising spiraled into civil war.1 The situation
became worse when the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) came into the
picture.2 ISIS, a vicious terrorist group that is now realizing that
sustaining a caliphate is much harder than declaring one, does not hide its
brutality. On many occasions, it had burned men alive or impaled their heads on
spikes and posts the videos online. And its fighters boast that they are doing
God’s will when they rape and enslave infidel girls and women. So naturally,
the fugitives or refugees from ISIS-occupied Syria and Iraq would be frightened
to return home. And the world
governments, especially that of Europe must believe they are telling the truth
and welcome them into their territories.3
European
Union: Live and let live
The citizens of the
European Union (EU) are lucky to be living in one of the richest and most
peaceful regions on Earth. They also like to think that they set the standard
for compassion. Generally speaking, all the countries that make up the EU
accept that they have both moral and legal duty to grant safe harbor to people
with a well-founded fear of persecution. The problem, however, is that the
recent surge of asylum-seekers – about 300,000 migrants (see table 1)4
– has tested Europe’s commitment to its ideals. In Germany, the government’s
effort create a welcoming atmosphere for refugees has sometimes being thwarted
by Neo-Nazi thugs who have torched asylum-seekers’ hostels on many occasions.
In Sweden, an anti-immigrant group is now the most popular political party in
the country. The story is the same in Hungary, where the prime minister warns
that illegal immigrants, which he considers a burden to the country’s public
services, threaten his nation’s survival.
Table
1: Migrants and Refugees Detected Entering EU Illegally, Jan. –July, 2015
Nationality of Migrant/Refugee
|
Number of People
|
Syria
|
106,939
|
Afghanistan
|
61,826
|
Eritrea
|
23,878
|
Nigeria
|
10,747
|
Pakistan
|
6,641
|
Kosovo
|
23,260
|
Other
Sub-Saharan Countries
|
9,766
|
Source:
Culled from BBC Data, 2015
So far, almost 270,000
asylum seekers have reached Europe by sea this year. This means that more
refugees and illegal immigrants entered the continent this year than last year.
But that number merely represents one asylum-seeker for every 1,900 Europeans
and, unfortunately, many of them will be turned away by their host
countries. It is important to note here
that helping refugees and asylum seekers hold more pluses than minuses. And,
when it comes to being nice to refugees and asylum seekers, the evidence of
history seems to be on the side of some nations
that are even poorer that Western European countries. Lebanon, for instance,
has welcomed approximately 1.1 Syrian refugees into their territory. This means
that the size of Syrian refugees welcomed by a tiny and poor country like
Lebanon is so large that it is almost the size of a quarter of the country’s
local population. Turkey has also taken in 1.7 million refugees. Even Tanzania,
a poor African nation whose average income is less than one-fiftieth of EU
nations, has hosted hundreds of thousands of refugees from Congo and
Burundi for decades without complaining
like Europe is currently doing. By contrast, when the European countries like
Greece and Italy where Arab and African refugees first arrived asked for help
with looking after them, the responses of other EU states has exposed them to a
well-founded charge of hypocrisy. As of last week, they grudgingly agreed to
take only 32,256 refugees over two years.5
What
Europe must do now: The economics of generosity
The best thing for Europe
would be to welcome the refugees and migrants, not only for moral reasons but
also for selfish ones too. First,
Europe’s labor force is ageing, which means that it will soon begin to shrink. European governments are also drowning in
debts, which they plan to dump on future generations. But if those future
generations are smaller in number, it will be a challenge for them to manage
Europe’s debts. This is where the
refugees and immigrants comes into the picture: they are typically young and
eager to work. In other words, these refugees and immigrants (including the
asylum seekers) can help Europe ease this problem once they are re-settled.
Simply put, the refugees and immigrants can help care for Europe’s elderly as
well as help the region shoulder a share of debts they had no role in running
up. As an example, Arabs and African refugees and migrants are usually young.
So if European governments handles this refugee crisis and all types of
migration sensibly, they can borrow some of their vitality. For Europe, this
may be a politically hard decision to take, especially given that it will also
require a reform of the region’s labor markets.6
It is quite
understandable why Europe is leery about absorbing these refugees and migrants,
given the intensity of global terrorism. To take care of this concern, Europe
should be firm when screening the asylum applicants. But the screening process
should also be swift and generous. It
will not be an exaggeration to say that these refugees and migrants will not
become slackers overnight – certainly not after crossing stormy seas and
deserts to get to Europe.7 On the contrary, there is documentary
evidence that immigrants around the world are more likely to start businesses
than the native-born. In the United States alone, large technology companies
like eBay, Google and Intel were founded by immigrants. In fact, many of
America’s greatest brands – which include General Electric, IBM, AT & T,
Budweiser, McDonald, Apple and Colgate – were started by founders who were either
immigrants or are the children of immigrants.8 Immigrants are also
net contributors to the public purse and are less likely to commit serious
crimes. Examined against this background, the fear that they will poach jobs or
drag down local wages, even though it may have huge resonance with the European
public, is also misplaced. Without putting it in so many words, when refugees
and migrants are properly settled, they actually tend to raise the wages of the
native-born overall because they bring complementary skills, ideas and connections
with them. Though their presence may slightly reduce the wages of the unskilled
local men, at the end of the day, everyone in the host country will be better
off. What is certain is that these
refugees and migrants can become several times more productive, and their wages
will rise accordingly if they are allowed to settle in Europe and other
advanced countries with predictable laws and efficient companies.
Those Europeans who
oppose immigration may argue that the refugees and migrants may bring in new cultures
whose effects on the region will be profoundly unsettling. They may equally
argue that Europe is neither willing nor able to absorb big inflows of refugees
and migrants. Broadly speaking,
Europeans recoil each time they see crowds of unassimilated and jobless
immigrants. Also, since the disarming of a gun-wielding Moroccan on a French
train last month9 and after the massacre at Charlie Hebdo,10 Europeans have become more scared of
Islamist terrorism.
To be fair to the
Europeans, their concerns are quite understandable. And, if the experience of the past few years
teaches us anything, it is that monitoring of jihadist groups needs to be
stepped up. Nevertheless, Europe still need to figure out a practical and
lasting solution to their current refugee and migrant crisis. If I have my
vote, the solution is simple: to assimilate them better, European nations
should let them work. This formula has been used before in Vancouver, New York
and London and it worked well.11 By working together and interacting
with the locals at the workplaces, the re-settled refugees and migrants can
learn their customs, and vice versa. The
bottom line here is that, just like the United States did with successive waves
of refugees in the 20th century,12 a more open Europe with
more flexible labor markets could turn this refugee and migrant crisis into a
rewarding opportunity.
References
1CNN(2015): Syria Civil War Fast Facts. Retrieved
September 9, 2015 from http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/27/world/meast/syria-civil-war-fast-facts/
2Landis J. (2014): The
Battle Between ISIS and Syria’s Rebel Militias. The Clarion Project. Retrieved September 9, 2015 from http://www.clarionproject.org/research/battle-between-isis-and-syria%E2%80%99s-rebel-militias
3Migration to Europe - Let Them in and Let Them Earn. (2015,
August 29). The Economist. Retrieved September 9, 2015 from
http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21662547-bigger-welcome-mat-would-be-europes-own-interest-let-them-and-let-them-earn.
4Why is EU Struggling With
Migrants and Asylum? (2015, September 1). BBC News. Retrieved September 9, 2015 from
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-24583286.
5Migration to Europe – Let
Them in and Let Them Earn, op. cit., p. 13
6Ibid
7Ibid
8Anderson S. (2011): 40
Percent of Fortune 500 Companies Founded by Immigrants or Their Children. Forbes. Retrieved September 14, 2015
from http://www.forbes.com/sites/stuartanderson/2011/06/19/40-percent-of-fortune-500-companies-founded-by-immigrants-or-their-children/
9Jamieeson A. (2015): How
American Heroes Prevented Terrorist Train Massacre. New York Post. Retrieved
September 14, 2015 from http://nypost.com/2015/08/22/americans-hailed-as-heroes-for-thwarting-terrorist-attack/
10The Charlie Hebdo Massacre in Paris. (2015, January 7). New
York Times. Retrieved September 14, 2015 from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/08/opinion/the-charlie-hebdo-massacre-in-paris.html.
11Migration to
Europe – Let Them in and Let Them Earn, op. cit., p. 14
12Ibid
No comments:
Post a Comment