The level of sycophancy in Donald Trump’s cabinet is not just irritating—it’s embarrassing. These are cabinet members, not backup singers. The people who are supposed to challenge, advise, and, when necessary, push back. Yet every time they open their mouths on TV, the script is the same. Praise the President. Sprinkle a few policy crumbs. Then go back to praising the President.
I’m not sitting in some press room with a badge on my chest. I sit in my living room, remote in hand, watching interviews, watching speeches, watching grown men with serious jobs talk like they’re trying to win a praise contest. And what I see is not leadership—it’s performance. Bad performance.
The level of sycophancy around Donald Trump is not
normal. It is irritating. It is ridiculous. These are cabinet members, not
backup singers. Yet every time they open their mouths on TV, the script is the
same. Praise the President. Sprinkle a few policy crumbs. Then go back to
praising the President. It’s like watching a broken jukebox stuck on one song—“All
Hail Trump, Remix Version.”
I watch Howard Lutnick speak. Commerce Secretary. Big
title. Big responsibility. The kind of role that should come with hard numbers,
sharp answers, clear direction. But instead of walking me through trade
balances, job creation, or manufacturing output, he starts with applause. Not
literal clapping—but verbal clapping. “The President’s leadership…” “The
President’s vision…” I’m sitting there thinking, “Sir, I didn’t tune in for a
thank-you speech. I want to know what you’re doing with the economy.” If you
spend all your time polishing the crown, the kingdom will rust.
Then comes Marco Rubio, Secretary of State. Foreign
policy. Wars. Alliances. Real stakes. A reporter asks a direct question about
global tensions. Instead of hitting the issue head-on, Rubio takes a detour
through Praise Avenue. Same script. Same tone. Same pattern. I’m not impressed.
I’m irritated. The world is not a campaign rally. Diplomacy is not a fan club.
And then Scott Bessent, the Treasury Secretary. This is
the money man. Inflation, debt, taxes—the backbone of the economy. The U.S.
national debt has crossed $34 trillion. Inflation has hit levels that squeezed
households in recent years. These are hard facts. Cold numbers. But when the
answer starts with praise instead of numbers, I already know where it’s going.
Nowhere fast.
Doug Burgum at Interior doesn’t break the pattern either.
Energy, land, resources—serious business. But again, the same routine plays
out. Praise first. Substance later. Sometimes barely any substance at all. It’s
like ordering a full meal and getting a plate of compliments instead.
Let me say this clearly so nobody twists my words: I am a
Republican. I voted for Trump. I’m not here to play fake neutral. But I’m also
not blind. I don’t clap just because someone tells me to clap. When Trump gets
it right, I say it. Border security? Stronger approach—good. Iran policy?
Tougher stance—good. But when he gets it wrong, I say that too. His tariff
policy? Problematic. Tariffs are not magic. They are taxes. Basic
economics—raise costs on imports, prices go up. Consumers pay. Businesses adjust.
That’s not politics. That’s simple math. And his relationship with Vladimir
Putin? That one doesn’t sit right. You don’t claim strength while getting cozy
with a war criminal. History has a way of punishing that kind of mixed signal. You
can’t shake hands with one hand and hide your guard with the other.
But this is bigger than Trump. This is about the people
around him. The people who are supposed to challenge, advise, and, when
necessary, push back. Instead, what I see is a room full of nodding heads. And
that is dangerous.
There’s a concept in psychology—groupthink. Irving Janis,
an American social psychologist, studied it. When everyone agrees, when nobody
questions the leader, bad decisions multiply. That’s not theory. That’s
history. The Bay of Pigs in 1961 collapsed partly because people around John F.
Kennedy didn’t push hard enough against flawed plans. Fast forward decades
later, different administrations, same pattern—too much agreement, not enough
challenge, and the cost is real.
Even outside politics, the lesson is the same. Enron
collapsed in 2001, wiping out $74 billion in value. Executives praised each
other while the numbers rotted underneath. Nobody wanted to be the one to say,
“This doesn’t make sense.” And when nobody speaks up, the truth dies quietly.
That’s what worries me when I watch these interviews. Not
just the praise itself, but what it replaces. It replaces honesty. It replaces
clarity. It replaces accountability. These officials are not paid to flatter.
They are paid to explain, to lead, to answer hard questions with hard facts. Instead,
I hear speeches that sound like they were written by a praise machine. Start
with Trump. End with Trump. Sprinkle a little policy in the middle like
seasoning. It’s predictable. It’s tiring. It’s weak.
I didn’t grow up thinking this was how American
leadership works. This country was built on debate, disagreement, and sharp
questions. Presidents are not kings. Cabinet members are not courtiers. They
are supposed to serve the public, not perform loyalty rituals on TV.
And here’s the truth nobody wants to say out loud: a
leader surrounded by constant praise becomes weaker, not stronger. If nobody
challenges you, you stop improving. If nobody questions you, you start
believing you’re always right. That’s how mistakes grow legs and start running.
I’m not asking for disrespect. I’m asking for balance.
Respect the President, yes. But do your job. Answer the question. Give the
numbers. Explain the policy. Stop turning every interview into a tribute show. Because
right now, what I see is simple: too much applause, not enough answers. And
when the applause gets louder than the truth, something is already going wrong.
For readers interested
in a separate line of thought, the titles in my “Brief Book Series” are
available on Google Play. Read them here on Google Play: Brief Book Series.

No comments:
Post a Comment