When someone tells me “violence is never okay,” I don’t nod—I question it. Because history doesn’t support that claim. Reality doesn’t support that claim. Life itself doesn’t support that claim. Violence is ugly. It’s destructive. It leaves scars that don’t heal. But sometimes, it’s the only language a threat understands.
When I hear people chant “peace, not war” and “unity, not
division,” I don’t clap—I pause. Not because I hate peace, but because I have
learned that slogans are cheap and reality is expensive. Anybody can say
“peace.” A child can say it. A politician can tweet it. A protester can print
it on a sign. But the real question—the adult question—is always the same: at
what price?
Because peace is not free. It never has been.
I look at history, and it doesn’t whisper this truth—it
screams it. The world we stand on today was not negotiated into existence with
polite conversations and hashtags. It was hammered into shape by conflict,
sacrifice, and decisions that made good people lose sleep. You don’t get
freedom by asking nicely—you get it by demanding it when the cost is
unbearable.
Take World War II. People like to sanitize it now, wrap
it in neat moral packaging. Good guys versus bad guys. But the numbers don’t
lie, and they don’t comfort either. Around 70 million to 85 million people died
globally. Cities were burned to ash. Families erased. Humanity dragged through
the mud and forced to look at itself in the mirror. That’s not peace—that’s
hell. But here’s the uncomfortable truth people try to dodge: without that war,
Adolf Hitler doesn’t just fade away. He consolidates power. The Holocaust
continues. Europe bends permanently under a regime built on racial supremacy
and brutality. The cost of not fighting would have been worse. Much worse. Sometimes,
refusing to fight isn’t peace—it’s surrender dressed up in nice words.
And that’s the part people don’t want to admit. They want
a world where peace comes without a bill. It doesn’t work like that. It never
has.
I think about the American Revolutionary War. Another
story people love to romanticize. Founding Fathers, liberty, independence—the
greatest hits. But behind that polished story is raw suffering. Around 25,000
American soldiers died. Only about 6,800 to 8,000 fell in battle. The
rest—around 17,000—died slow, ugly deaths from disease, starvation, or rotting
away in prison camps. Add another 8,500 to 25,000 wounded or permanently
disabled. That’s not a victory parade—that’s a graveyard. And yet, without that
bloodshed, there is no United States of America. No Constitution. No Bill of
Rights. No speeches about freedom. No debates about democracy. Nothing. Just
another colony under British rule, waiting for permission to breathe.
So when someone tells me “violence is never okay,” I
don’t nod—I question it. Because history doesn’t support that claim. Reality
doesn’t support that claim. Life itself doesn’t support that claim. Violence is
ugly. It’s destructive. It leaves scars that don’t heal. But sometimes, it’s
the only language a threat understands.
That doesn’t mean we celebrate it. It means we
recognize it. There’s a difference.
We live in a time where people confuse comfort with
morality. If something feels uncomfortable, they label it wrong. If something
is harsh, they call it evil. But the world doesn’t run on feelings. It runs on
consequences. And sometimes the consequence of doing nothing is far worse than
the consequence of acting.
Look at genocides that happened because people hesitated.
The Rwandan genocide in 1994 killed about 800,000 people in roughly 100 days.
The world watched. Debated. Issued statements. “Unity, not division,” right?
But unity without action is just silence. And silence, in that case, was
deadly.
Or take the Balkans in the 1990s. Ethnic cleansing didn’t
stop because people held hands and sang about peace. It stopped when force was
applied. When lines were drawn. When someone finally said, “Enough.”
This is the tension nobody wants to sit with. Peace is
the goal, but force is sometimes the path. It’s messy. It’s morally
uncomfortable. It doesn’t fit neatly into slogans or social media posts. But
it’s real.
And that’s the problem with slogans. They flatten
reality. They turn complex, brutal truths into feel-good sound bites. “Unity,
not division.” Sounds great—until you realize unity with injustice is not
virtue, it’s complicity. “Peace, not war.” Sounds noble—until you realize peace
at any cost can mean living under tyranny.
You can’t negotiate with a gun pointed at your head
and call it peace.
I’m not arguing for endless war. I’m not saying violence
is the answer to everything. That would be foolish. But I am saying this:
pretending violence is never necessary is just as dangerous. It blinds us. It
weakens us. It leaves us unprepared for moments when hard decisions must be
made. Because those moments always come. And when they do, slogans won’t save
you. Hashtags won’t protect you. Good intentions won’t stop someone determined
to harm you. What matters then is clarity—the ability to see the situation for
what it is, not what you wish it to be.
History rewards clarity. It punishes denial. The people
who fought in World War II didn’t have the luxury of pretending everything
could be solved peacefully. The soldiers in the Revolutionary War didn’t have
the option to tweet their way to independence. They faced reality head-on, ugly
as it was, and paid the price.
That’s why I roll my eyes at empty slogans. Not because I
reject peace or unity, but because I respect them too much to reduce them to
cheap words. Peace is not a chant—it’s a result. Unity is not a demand—it’s a
choice built on shared values, not forced agreement.
And both come at a cost.
So the next time I hear someone say “violence is never
okay,” I won’t argue loudly. I’ll just remember the graves. I’ll remember the
wars that had to be fought, the lives that were lost, the world that would look
very different if those fights had never happened.
Sometimes, the price of peace is paid in blood—and
pretending otherwise is the most dangerous lie of all.
For readers interested
in a separate line of thought, the titles in my “Brief Book Series” are
available on Google Play. Read them here on Google Play: Brief Book Series.

No comments:
Post a Comment